Our wood for the winter should arrive this week. Whatever day it gets here is guaranteed to be 90 degrees and humid. It's a law of physics. Wood needs to be stacked in garage = unseasonably hot weather + new hatching of mosquitoes and deerflies. But it's comforting in a weird, sweaty way, to know the wood is coming, because it means I can start thinking of cool fall nights with a fire crackling in the fireplace.
Since I have starting fires on the mind, I might as well share my curmudgeonly opinion about whether YA books get enough respect in the field of literature. (Chasing Ray is doing a great job gathering opinions about this.)
This is a generalized opinion, not specifically tied to any one article or blog post. It comes after nearly a decade of being introduced as "the lady who wrote SPEAK." If you are easily offended or irritated, you should probably change the channel now.
They don't respect us for writing YA? Who gives a damn what they think? People who don't understand the significance of YA literature to our culture are either ignorant or they are idiots.
Ignorance I can deal with. Lots of folks have been busy for the last fifteen years. They missed the revolution and are just now beginning to hear about this thing called YA. They lack information. Without information they are not in a position to judge. So if they look down on me for writing books for teenagers, it's easy to shrug off their opinions because they are grounded in nothing.
Idiots don't deserve my time or energy. They are the ones who make grand pronouncements on literature, who believe that the best way to educate a 14-year-old who reads below grade level is to shove Great Expectations down his throat. Then, when the kid says that the book sucks and that all books suck, and he reaches for his game controller, they are shocked and appalled at this horrifying, illiterate generation.
Idiots sometimes write dense short stories in which nothing happens that cause a sub-section of erudite inhabitants of Brooklyn to twitter and fawn, but leave the rest of the reading world scratching their heads.
When idiots look down their oh-so-refined noses at the raucous world of children's and YA literature, it says oodles about the condition of their own spirits without contributing to the discussion at all. So I guess instead of flipping them the bird, I should try and be a little more understanding.
Or maybe not.
Are you sensing something defensive about this rant? Something snarly, cranky, maybe a little over-the-top? Yeah, I'm feeling my adolescent oats. I suspect I always will. That's part of what makes me an enthusiastically happy YA author. I adore teenagers and I have a lot of empathy for what the culture puts them through. They are disdained, disrespected, patronized, criticized and scorned.
Gee, that's the same attitude YA authors often run into.
So maybe the ignorant and the idiots are good for us. Maybe we need them to keep snubbing our work and dismissing our dreams because it reminds us what our readers are facing every day.
Any thoughts?
WFMAD Day 22
Today's goal: Hasn't changed. Write for 15 minutes. Don't stress about the number of words you produce. Your brain is not a factory making word-widgets.
Today's mindset: hopeful
Today's prompt: I'm thinking ahead to what seeds I want to order for the garden next year. (BTW, if anyone has had success with using nematodes to control Japanese beetles, please tell me about it.)
I keep a gardening journal. As ideas come up for long-terms gardening adventures, I write them down. I need to ponder some ideas for years before I can really see the best way to execute them.
The same thing goes for books. There is a Future Projects file on my computer that is huge, and notebooks stuffed with ideas. These are the seed packets for my writing for the next decade.
Use your fifteen minutes today to write down seed-ideas for your writing for the next ten years. Let your imagination go wild.
Scribblescribble...
Since I have starting fires on the mind, I might as well share my curmudgeonly opinion about whether YA books get enough respect in the field of literature. (Chasing Ray is doing a great job gathering opinions about this.)
This is a generalized opinion, not specifically tied to any one article or blog post. It comes after nearly a decade of being introduced as "the lady who wrote SPEAK." If you are easily offended or irritated, you should probably change the channel now.
They don't respect us for writing YA? Who gives a damn what they think? People who don't understand the significance of YA literature to our culture are either ignorant or they are idiots.
Ignorance I can deal with. Lots of folks have been busy for the last fifteen years. They missed the revolution and are just now beginning to hear about this thing called YA. They lack information. Without information they are not in a position to judge. So if they look down on me for writing books for teenagers, it's easy to shrug off their opinions because they are grounded in nothing.
Idiots don't deserve my time or energy. They are the ones who make grand pronouncements on literature, who believe that the best way to educate a 14-year-old who reads below grade level is to shove Great Expectations down his throat. Then, when the kid says that the book sucks and that all books suck, and he reaches for his game controller, they are shocked and appalled at this horrifying, illiterate generation.
Idiots sometimes write dense short stories in which nothing happens that cause a sub-section of erudite inhabitants of Brooklyn to twitter and fawn, but leave the rest of the reading world scratching their heads.
When idiots look down their oh-so-refined noses at the raucous world of children's and YA literature, it says oodles about the condition of their own spirits without contributing to the discussion at all. So I guess instead of flipping them the bird, I should try and be a little more understanding.
Or maybe not.
Are you sensing something defensive about this rant? Something snarly, cranky, maybe a little over-the-top? Yeah, I'm feeling my adolescent oats. I suspect I always will. That's part of what makes me an enthusiastically happy YA author. I adore teenagers and I have a lot of empathy for what the culture puts them through. They are disdained, disrespected, patronized, criticized and scorned.
Gee, that's the same attitude YA authors often run into.
So maybe the ignorant and the idiots are good for us. Maybe we need them to keep snubbing our work and dismissing our dreams because it reminds us what our readers are facing every day.
Any thoughts?
WFMAD Day 22
Today's goal: Hasn't changed. Write for 15 minutes. Don't stress about the number of words you produce. Your brain is not a factory making word-widgets.
Today's mindset: hopeful
Today's prompt: I'm thinking ahead to what seeds I want to order for the garden next year. (BTW, if anyone has had success with using nematodes to control Japanese beetles, please tell me about it.)
I keep a gardening journal. As ideas come up for long-terms gardening adventures, I write them down. I need to ponder some ideas for years before I can really see the best way to execute them.
The same thing goes for books. There is a Future Projects file on my computer that is huge, and notebooks stuffed with ideas. These are the seed packets for my writing for the next decade.
Use your fifteen minutes today to write down seed-ideas for your writing for the next ten years. Let your imagination go wild.
Scribblescribble...


Comments
J
It almost seems like the way you know whether something truly matters is how much respect it doesn't get from the culture at large. YA literature, teachers, nurses, plumbers. Even if I didn't write YA, I'd still read it, because YA authors seem to write about things that matter. That's not so much the case with many writers for the adult market.
Japanese beetles--nematodes didn't do much the couple years I tried them. I keep a covered jar by their favorite targets and drop in any beetles I see, leaving the jar in the sun. It's rough, but so is what they do to my beans.
And then I woke up.
A writer is nothing without an audience of readers. A story that is never read is no story at all. The purpose of a book is to find its reader wherever that reader is. All forms of literature can do that. All genres of fiction can do that (literary fiction *is* a genre, with the same type of rigid, non-negotiable rules that defines, say, romance novels). It is not which literature or which genre of literature is best, but which is best for the reader.
Personally, I want to be read, so I'll repeat what I posted on Justine Larbalestier's blog. Writers for adults, please remain in your market category. You can keep the highly competitive, non-paying literary magazine market, the MFA programs, the great ambition of being published by a small or university press. You can be the king of the prestige hill or walk about with a dab of snot on your noses looking down on other writers. Be my guest.
Here’s a box of tissues. Please go away.
Edited at 2008-07-22 01:51 pm (UTC)
With regards to YA literature I have the following to share. When look back at the books that made an impression on me they were not the ones that were assigned in class. If anything those were the books turned me away from reading. I can see this happening with my own child today but it is much better than when I was growing up. My teen daughter was selected to partake in a reading program this summer for gifted students. The books assigned are clearly for adults and there is not one that a teen could identify with. Guess what? She hates it, big surprise. Getting her to read these books has been like pulling teeth. With all the great YA books out there why adult reading material is assigned is baffling to me.
It puzzles me over and over again that adults get to read for fun, but kids and teens are expected to read only books that are actively "good" for them. Even aside from the question of what makes us think only certain books are good for us--why do we think kids and teens don't have the same right adults too, to read a book purely for fun?
I got in a full day of work yesterday, again. :D Only a couple hours today, but that's okay. Got other things that need doing, and I'll be back tomorrow. :)
Question for you: what do you do after you finish one of your projects? Do you jump right into the next? Or do you take some time to wind down first?
I am already deep into the next book by the time I finish the previous one. I have no desire to take a break. Maybe someday, but not now.
Word.
I have no plans to stop reading YA, although I'm technically not the age the genre is aimed at, so I'm glad YA authors have no plans to stop writing it.
This quote from the New Yorker made me grin.
At the time, you had to be fourteen, and a boy, to get into the Astor Library, which opened in 1854, the same year as the Boston Public Library, the country’s first publicly funded city library, where you had to be sixteen. Even if you got inside, the librarians would shush you, carping about how the “young fry” read nothing but “the trashy”: Scott, Cooper, and Dickens (one century’s garbage being, as ever, another century’s Great Books).
My fourteen-year-old son, not an avid reader to begin with, has to read SNOW IN AUGUST before he goes to high school this fall. I actually read the book several years ago in my adult book club. I enjoyed it, but I thought it was a pretty tough read, as did most of the folks in my book club. We are all avid readers and all women.
I'm reading most of the book out loud to him. My son enjoys about every fourth chapter. For the most part, there is way too much description, and way too little action to satisfy him. He's also struggling with a lack of background knowledge- the main character is Catholic, we're Protestant. There is also lots of Jewish culture and mythology. The book switches back and forth between Brooklyn in the 1940's and Prague in the 1500's.
My son has decided:A) reading is definitely boring and B) high school is going to be too hard for him. Every day, I wonder why they couldn't have handed us a calendar, and told him to read thirty minutes a day. I'm longing for a good YA novel for him right now!
Have him give that one a try.
If your son is mentally challenged in some way, I deeply apologise, but it seems odd to me that such a child would be given a difficult book to read over the Summer.
Here is a link you may find useful.
Julie
Children need to be exposed to literature such as Great Expectations. I am living proof that some will not only enjoy it, but would hate to be underestimated.
If worse comes to worst, separate the classes: don't compromise a child's education, simply because some brat is perpetuating a myth about teenagers and reading.
Don't mean to sound so goddamn arrogant, but neglecting the minority isn't solving the problem, either.
There are some highly proficient readers whose decoding skills will allow them to enjoy the story, no doubt. And they should be given that book and many others so they can keep meeting new levels of understanding and growth.
But the label of "classic" is meaningless if it means a book inappropriate to the reader is force-fed to a student who is not prepared for it.
I think the goal of English classes is first and foremost to create literate Americans. We are not succeeding. We're not even close. The average American reads on an eighth grade level.
Great Expectations will be there when today's high school student - who is struggling to read on grade and who is in danger of becoming a book hater - is an adult. If he is lucky enough to live in an enlightened school district, or have parents who understand how to foster reading for fun, he'll be given books that hold his attention, while challenging him enough to increase his reading skills.
They take AP English. Most of them adore it and succeed wildly.
I'm off to write down seed-ideas. And some small part of my brain wants to know whether your gardening journal is on the computer or in a journal/notebook.
But mostly i am commenting because i have a question.
Idiots sometimes write dense short stories in which nothing happens that cause a sub-section of erudite inhabitants of Brooklyn to twitter and fawn, but leave the rest of the reading world scratching their heads.
Can you clarify this part? I'm guessing you're saying that these stories shouldnt be written, or that there is something wrong with them, because you're calling their authors idiots. But i'm not understanding why a story is necessarily bad because it was only written for a small audience. (My only guess is you're saying kids have to read this stuff in school...but if that's the case, i would say that's the school's faults for choosing the wrong lit for their students, not the author's fault for writing it.)
So. So. True.
As a reader of YA literature, people often look down their noses at me because I "should" be reading Shakespeare and Dickens and all manner of more challenging words, or that I "should move up" to adult books. I do read the classics, but I also read YA books because at some point I realized that YA books tackle some of the same VERY difficult issues without the inclusion of gratuitous violence or sex added in simply because at the "adult" level, the authors can.
And on the subject of the dense short stories, I have read them and refuse to "twitter and fawn" unless something actually happens. If it's all florid prose and no substance, it's not a story but a jumble of fancy words strung together like pretty beads with weak thread to bind them and no throat to wear them. There isn't a point to the sparkle.